↓ Skip to main content

Field comparison of shallow seismic sources

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysics, November 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field comparison of shallow seismic sources
Published in
Geophysics, November 1986
DOI 10.1190/1.1442061
Authors

R. D. Miller, S. E. Pullan, J. S. Waldner, F. P. Haeni

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 2 4%
Professor 1 2%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 38 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 16%
Engineering 7 12%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 38 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#5,608,892
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Geophysics
#666
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,428
of 393,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysics
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.