↓ Skip to main content

Subacute exposure to Roundup® changes steroidogenesis and gene expression of the glutathione-glutaredoxin system in rat ovaries: Implications for ovarian toxicity of this glyphosate-based herbicide

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subacute exposure to Roundup® changes steroidogenesis and gene expression of the glutathione-glutaredoxin system in rat ovaries: Implications for ovarian toxicity of this glyphosate-based herbicide
Published in
Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology, June 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.taap.2023.116599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Chitolina, Patrícia Nicola, Adrieli Sachett, Fernanda Bevilaqua, Lemen Cunico, Alissara Reginatto, Kanandra Bertoncello, Katiuska Marins, Ana Paula Zanatta, Marta Medeiros, Acauane S Lima, Cristiane Parisotto, Jean Carlo O Menegatt, André F Goetten, Francielli C Zimermann, Adriano T Ramos, Valério M Portela, Marcos H Barreta, Greicy Michelle M Conterato, Leila Zanatta

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,288,365
of 26,434,713 outputs
Outputs from Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology
#60
of 6,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,470
of 393,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,434,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.