| Title |
It Is Time to Consider Cultural Differences in Debriefing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Simulation in Healthcare, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sih.0b013e318291d9ef |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hyun Soo Chung, Peter Dieckmann, Saul Barry Issenberg |
| Abstract |
Debriefing plays a critical role in facilitated reflection of simulation after the experiential component of simulation-based learning. The concept of framing and reflective learning in a debriefing session has emanated primarily from Western cultures. However, non-Western cultures have significant characteristics that manifest themselves in teaching and learning practices substantially different from Western cultures. We need to consider how to balance standardization in debriefing with a culture-sensitive interpretation of simulation-based learning so that learners receive the maximum benefit from debriefing sessions. Our goal was to raise awareness of cultural differences and stimulate work to make progress in this regard. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 23% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 36% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,111,701
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#20
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,811
of 197,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.