You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Humic and fulvic acids: sink or source in the availability of metals to the marine bivalves Macoma balthica and Potamocorbula amurensis?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Ecology Progress Series, January 1994
|
| DOI | 10.3354/meps108133 |
| Authors |
AW Decho, SN Luoma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Professor | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Marine Ecology Progress Series
#2,171
of 5,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,450
of 71,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Ecology Progress Series
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.