A Matter of Prescriptive Clarity? Analysing How Swedish Judges' Motives for Action Vary in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Common Market Studies, June 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 25 X users

So far, Altmetric has seen 35 X posts from 25 X users, with an upper bound of 54,304 followers.

RT @UU_PoliSci: In @JCMS_EU; @Koritchi analyses how Swedish judges’ motives for action vary in the preliminary ruling procedure, depending…

01 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @UU_PoliSci: In @JCMS_EU; @Koritchi analyses how Swedish judges’ motives for action vary in the preliminary ruling procedure, depending…

28 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @UU_PoliSci: In @JCMS_EU; @Koritchi analyses how Swedish judges’ motives for action vary in the preliminary ruling procedure, depending…

28 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

In @JCMS_EU; @Koritchi analyses how Swedish judges’ motives for action vary in the preliminary ruling procedure, depending on the clarity of EU legal frameworks https://t.co/SmVpZFl1Y4

28 Nov 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 31 additional X posts.