An epidemiological study of unintentional pediatric firearm fatalities in the USA, 2009–2018
Injury Epidemiology, June 2023
Arti Vaishnav, Gary A. Smith, Jaahnavi Badeti, Nichole L. Michaels
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||26||76%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||9%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||33%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||33%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 599. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,403,034 outputs
Outputs from Injury Epidemiology
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 348,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Injury Epidemiology
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,403,034 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.