Title |
Transcriptomic imprints of adaptation to fresh water: parallel evolution of osmoregulatory gene expression in the Alewife
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Ecology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1111/mec.13983 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan P. Velotta, Jill L. Wegrzyn, Samuel Ginzburg, Lin Kang, Sergiusz Czesny, Rachel J. O'Neill, Stephen D. McCormick, Pawel Michalak, Eric T. Schultz |
Abstract |
Comparative approaches in physiological genomics offer an opportunity to understand the functional importance of genes involved in niche exploitation. We used populations of Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) to explore the transcriptional mechanisms that underlie adaptation to fresh water. Ancestrally anadromous Alewives have recently formed multiple, independently derived, landlocked populations, which exhibit reduced tolerance of saltwater and enhanced tolerance of fresh water. Using RNA-seq, we compared transcriptional responses of an anadromous Alewife population to two landlocked populations after acclimation to fresh (0 ppt)- and salt-water (35 ppt). Our results suggest that the gill transcriptome has evolved in primarily discordant ways between independent landlocked populations and their anadromous ancestor. By contrast, evolved shifts in the transcription of a small suite of well-characterized osmoregulatory genes exhibited a strong degree of parallelism. In particular, transcription of genes that regulate gill ion exchange has diverged in accordance with functional predictions: fresh water ion uptake genes (most notably, the 'freshwater paralog' of Na(+) /K(+) -ATPase α -subunit) were more highly expressed in landlocked forms, whereas genes that regulate saltwater ion secretion (e.g., the 'saltwater paralog' of NKAα) exhibited a blunted response to saltwater. Parallel divergence of ion-transport gene expression is associated with shifts in salinity tolerance limits among landlocked forms, suggesting that changes to the gill's transcriptional response to salinity facilitates fresh water adaptation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 39% |
Canada | 3 | 17% |
Finland | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 61% |
Members of the public | 6 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 24% |
Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Professor | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 57% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 26% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |