↓ Skip to main content

Trees harbouring ants are better defended than con-generic and sympatric ant-free trees

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Trees harbouring ants are better defended than con-generic and sympatric ant-free trees
Published in
The Science of Nature, June 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00114-023-01858-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inácio José de Melo Teles e Gomes, Matheus Oliveira Neves, Lucas Navarro Paolucci

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 100%
Unspecified 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,458,159
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#691
of 2,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,459
of 257,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.