The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparison of high‐ and low‐resolution gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for herbal product classification: A case study with Ocimum essential oils
|
---|---|
Published in |
Phytochemical Analysis, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/pca.3258 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evelyn J. Abraham, E. Diane Wallace, Joshua J. Kellogg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 31% |
Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 62% |
Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,525,238
of 25,050,563 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemical Analysis
#35
of 685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,520
of 353,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemical Analysis
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,050,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.