You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Facial approximation: a review of the current state of play for archaeologists
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.1002/oa.787 |
Authors |
C. N. Stephan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 31% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 31% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,854,991
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
#257
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,257
of 139,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.