↓ Skip to main content

Divertículo epifrênico de esôfago

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Divertículo epifrênico de esôfago
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ramb.2013.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elias Jirjoss Ilias, Paulo Kassab

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Unknown 10 83%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,293,347
of 4,654,880 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,666
of 90,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,654,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them