↓ Skip to main content

Rituals, ceremonies and customs related to sacred trees with a special reference to the Middle East

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rituals, ceremonies and customs related to sacred trees with a special reference to the Middle East
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-3-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amots Dafni

Abstract

Tree worship is very common worldwide. This field study surveys the ceremonies and customs related to sacred trees in present-day Israel; it includes the results of interviews with 98 informants in thirty-one Arab, Bedouin, and Druze villages in the Galilee. The main results are: 1. Sacred trees were treated as another kind of sacred entity with all their metaphysical as well as physical manifestations. 2. There is not even one ceremony or custom that is peculiar only to a sacred tree and is not performed in other sacred places (such as a saint's grave or a mosque). 3. Few customs, such as: quarrel settling (= Sulkha), leaving objects to absorb the divine blessing and leaving objects for charity) seem to be characteristic of this region, only. 4. In modern times, sacred trees were never recorded, in Israel, as centres for official religious ceremonies including sacrifices, nor as places for the performing of rites of passage. 5. There is some variation among the different ethnic groups: Kissing trees and worshipping them is more common among the Druze although carrying out burials under the tree, leaving water and rain-making ceremonies under them have not been recorded in this group. Passing judgments under the tree is more typical of the Bedouin in which the sacred trees were commonly used as a public social centre. Most of the customs surveyed here are known from other parts of the world. The differences between Muslims and Druze are related to the latter's belief in the transmigration of souls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 48 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 49 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,873,550
of 25,050,563 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#242
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,253
of 76,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,050,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.