↓ Skip to main content

Immune Toxicities Elicted by CTLA-4 Blockade in Cancer Patients Are Associated with Early Diversification of the T-cell Repertoire

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune Toxicities Elicted by CTLA-4 Blockade in Cancer Patients Are Associated with Early Diversification of the T-cell Repertoire
Published in
Cancer Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2324
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Y Oh, Jason Cham, Li Zhang, Grant Fong, Serena S Kwek, Mark Klinger, Malek Faham, Lawrence Fong

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,535,524
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#4,272
of 19,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,831
of 325,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#50
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.