You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modular, rule-based modeling for the design of eukaryotic synthetic gene circuits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-7-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mario Andrea Marchisio, Moreno Colaiacovo, Ellis Whitehead, Jörg Stelling |
| Abstract |
The modular design of synthetic gene circuits via composable parts (DNA segments) and pools of signal carriers (molecules such as RNA polymerases and ribosomes) has been successfully applied to bacterial systems. However, eukaryotic cells are becoming a preferential host for new synthetic biology applications. Therefore, an accurate description of the intricate network of reactions that take place inside eukaryotic parts and pools is necessary. Rule-based modeling approaches are increasingly used to obtain compact representations of reaction networks in biological systems. However, this approach is intrinsically non-modular and not suitable per se for the description of composable genetic modules. In contrast, the Model Description Language (MDL) adopted by the modeling tool ProMoT is highly modular and it enables a faithful representation of biological parts and pools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,582,057
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#146
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,733
of 195,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.