You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nutritional strategies of physically active subjects with muscle dysmorphia
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Archives of Medicine, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1755-7682-6-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nadir Contesini, Fernando Adami, Márcia de-Toledo Blake, Carlos BM Monteiro, Luiz C Abreu, Vitor E Valenti, Fernando S Almeida, Alexandre P Luciano, Marco A Cardoso, Jucemar Benedet, Francisco de Assis Guedes de Vasconcelos, Claudio Leone, Deivis Elton Schlickmann Frainer |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to identify dietary strategies for physically active individuals with muscle dysmorphia based on a systematic literature review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Professor | 6 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 9% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,394,488
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#13
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,013
of 207,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them