You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of adherence therapy versus health education for people with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial in four European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-11-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Patel, Paul McCrone, Morven Leese, Francesco Amaddeo, Michele Tansella, Reinhold Kilian, Matthias Angermeyer, Martijn Kikkert, Aart Schene, Martin Knapp |
| Abstract |
Non-adherence to anti-psychotics is common, expensive and affects recovery. We therefore examine the cost-effectiveness of adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia by multi-centre randomised trial in Amsterdam, London, Leipzig and Verona. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
| Psychology | 18 | 21% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#421
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,812
of 207,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.