↓ Skip to main content

Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012486
Authors

Sharon P Parry, Pieter Coenen, Peter B O'Sullivan, Christopher G Maher, Leon M Straker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Engineering 5 8%
Psychology 5 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#794,977
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,491
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,505
of 423,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.