You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of stool swabs in molecular transport media increases access to Xpert Ultra testing for TB in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.5588/ijtld.22.0530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Chibolela, P. de Haas, E. Klinkenberg, B. Kosloff, C. Chunda-Liyoka, P. Lungu, C. Chabala |
| Abstract |
SETTING: Tertiary level hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.OBJECTIVE: To measure concordance between Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) results of stool with and without transport media, and compare Ultra results from the two stool processing methods to Ultra and culture results using gastric aspirates (GA).DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study collecting stool and GA from children 0-5 years presenting with signs and symptoms of TB. Stool was processed for Ultra testing by two methods: the Simple-One-Step (SOS) on an aliquot of stool and PrimeStore® MTM Molecular Transport Medium (PS-MTM) using a stool swab.RESULTS: A total of 114 children (median age: 17 months, IQR 7-30) provided both a stool and a GA sample. Stool Ultra results processed using the PS-MTM method showed high concordance with stool Ultra results processed by the SOS method, with only 1/114 discordant results. Concordance with GA Ultra was high as well, as 9/13 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) cases detected were identified by all three methods.CONCLUSION: Ultra results from stool swabs collected using PS-MTM were equivalent to results from stool using the SOS method and GA. Given that PS-MTM inactivates MTB and stabilises DNA without cold chain, using it for stool has the potential to increase access to a TB diagnosis for children in underserved areas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Zambia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#993,281
of 24,309,087 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
#38
of 2,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,163
of 231,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,309,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.