↓ Skip to main content

Habitat suitability of golden mahseer young ones (Tor putitora, Hamilton 1822) in Himalayan waters, India

Overview of attention for article published in River Research & Applications, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Habitat suitability of golden mahseer young ones (Tor putitora, Hamilton 1822) in Himalayan waters, India
Published in
River Research & Applications, July 2023
DOI 10.1002/rra.4192
Authors

Bhawna Dhawan, Kuppusammy Sivakumar, Jeyaraj Antony Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,191,065
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from River Research & Applications
#191
of 941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,695
of 340,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from River Research & Applications
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 941 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.