You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data-driven approach to identifying potential laboratory overuse in general internal medicine (GIM) inpatients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Quality, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002261 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weinerman, Adina S, Guo, Yishan, Saha, Sudipta, Yip, Paul M, Lapointe-Shaw, Lauren, Fralick, Michael, Kwan, Janice L, MacMillan, Thomas E, Liu, Jessica, Rawal, Shail, Sheehan, Kathleen A, Simons, Janet, Tang, Terence, Bhatia, Sacha, Razak, Fahad, Verma, Amol A |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 11 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,703,417
of 24,294,745 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#76
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,765
of 244,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,745 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.