↓ Skip to main content

Crystallography without crystals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Crystallography without crystals
Published in
Nature Methods, May 2013
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison Doerr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Chemistry 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Other 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#2,449,416
of 5,040,289 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,818
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,549
of 94,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#69
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,040,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 50th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.