↓ Skip to main content

Direct Imaging of Covalent Bond Structure in Single-Molecule Chemical Reactions

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
348 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
653 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct Imaging of Covalent Bond Structure in Single-Molecule Chemical Reactions
Published in
Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1238187
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. G. de Oteyza, P. Gorman, Y.-C. Chen, S. Wickenburg, A. Riss, D. J. Mowbray, G. Etkin, Z. Pedramrazi, H.-Z. Tsai, A. Rubio, M. F. Crommie, F. R. Fischer

Abstract

Observing the intricate chemical transformation of an individual molecule as it undergoes a complex reaction is a long-standing challenge in molecular imaging. Advances in scanning probe microscopy now provide the tools to visualize not only the frontier orbitals of chemical reaction partners and products, but their internal covalent bond configurations as well. We used noncontact atomic force microscopy to investigate reaction-induced changes in the detailed internal bond structure of individual oligo-(phenylene-1,2-ethynylenes) on a (100) oriented silver surface as they underwent a series of cyclization processes. Our images reveal the complex surface reaction mechanisms underlying thermally induced cyclization cascades of enediynes. Calculations using ab initio density functional theory provide additional support for the proposed reaction pathways.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,473 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 653 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 14 2%
United States 13 2%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Japan 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
China 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 579 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 224 34%
Researcher 139 21%
Student > Master 64 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 6%
Student > Bachelor 40 6%
Other 111 17%
Unknown 33 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 216 33%
Physics and Astronomy 159 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 12%
Materials Science 55 8%
Engineering 34 5%
Other 52 8%
Unknown 56 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 742. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,001
of 17,669,649 outputs
Outputs from Science
#828
of 70,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75
of 165,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#6
of 866 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,669,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 866 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.