↓ Skip to main content

A New Direction in Ophthalmic Development: Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 2,484)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Direction in Ophthalmic Development: Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems
Published in
Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2016
DOI 10.2174/1381612822666160813234723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Velichka Andonova, Velichka Yordanova Andonova

Abstract

The purpose of each dosage form is to provide an optimal therapeutic effect with a minimum dose and with minimal side effects. This is particularly relevant for drugs that require systemic administration, higher dosing and/or show lower bioavailability. Тhe eye as an anatomical structure is an extremely protected organ. In this regard, providing an optimal bioavailability in the eye tissues, resulting in the desired therapeutic effect represents a major challenge. This is especially true for the treatment of diseases, affecting the posterior segment after topically administered drug formulations. The use of nano- and microcarriers of drug substances may be an appropriate technological approach, to provide a high bioavailability of the drug substance for a certain interval of time at the right place. The purpose of this review is to indicate how nano- and microcarriers of drug substances can solve the problems with the drug delivery in the ocular tissues, to indicate the possible hazards and side effects, depending on the polymer nature and route of administration, and to visualize the future potential of these carriers in the pharmaceutical practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 60%
Chemistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#217,607
of 11,648,047 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#17
of 2,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,671
of 322,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#2
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,648,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.