↓ Skip to main content

Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen E Petersen, Paul M Matthews, Fabian Bamberg, David A Bluemke, Jane M Francis, Matthias G Friedrich, Paul Leeson, Eike Nagel, Sven Plein, Frank E Rademakers, Alistair A Young, Steve Garratt, Tim Peakman, Jonathan Sellors, Rory Collins, Stefan Neubauer

Abstract

UK Biobank is a prospective cohort study with 500,000 participants aged 40 to 69. Recently an enhanced imaging study received funding. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) will be part of a multi-organ, multi-modality imaging visit in 3-4 dedicated UK Biobank imaging centres that will acquire and store imaging data from 100,000 participants (subject to successful piloting). In each of UK Biobank's dedicated bespoke imaging centres, it is proposed that 15-20 participants will undergo a 2 to 3 hour visit per day, seven days a week over a period of 5-6 years. The imaging modalities will include brain MRI at 3 Tesla, CMR and abdominal MRI at 1.5 Tesla, carotid ultrasound and DEXA scans using carefully selected protocols. We reviewed the rationale, challenges and proposed approaches for concise phenotyping using CMR on such a large scale. Here, we discuss the benefits of this imaging study and review existing and planned population based cardiovascular imaging in prospective cohort studies. We will evaluate the CMR protocol, feasibility, process optimisation and costs. Procedures for incidental findings, quality control and data processing and analysis are also presented. As is the case for all other data in the UK Biobank resource, this database of images and related information will be made available through UK Biobank's Access Procedures to researchers (irrespective of their country of origin and whether they are academic or commercial) for health-related research that is in the public interest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 183 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 19%
Other 15 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 35%
Computer Science 21 11%
Engineering 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,251,724
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#346
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,537
of 207,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.