You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Who is in Your Waiting Room? Health Care Professionals as Culturally Responsive and Trauma-Informed First Responders to Human Trafficking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AMA Journal of Ethics, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.pfor2-1701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Abstract |
Evidence-based practice standards are not yet well defined for assisting potential victims of human trafficking. Nonetheless, health care professionals are learning to be first responders in identifying, treating, and referring potential victims. As more public and private sector resources are used to train health care professionals about human trafficking, more evaluation and research are needed to develop an effective standard of care. Adopting a public health lens and using the "National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care" can guide critical decision making and actions. Through collaboration between researchers and policymakers, lessons learned in health care settings can inform future evidence-based standards of care so that all patients receive the services that they need. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 46% |
| Canada | 4 | 11% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |