You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006095.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua Z Goldenberg, Stephanie SY, Jane D Saxton, Mark R Martzen, Per O Vandvik, Kristian Thorlund, Gordon H Guyatt, Bradley C Johnston |
Abstract |
Antibiotics are widely prescribed; however they can cause disturbances in gastrointestinal flora which may lead to reduced resistance to pathogens such as Clostridium difficile (C. difficile). Probiotics are live organisms thought to balance the gastrointestinal flora. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 13% |
Spain | 10 | 8% |
Canada | 10 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 8% |
Australia | 9 | 8% |
Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
New Zealand | 3 | 3% |
Norway | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 74 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 19% |
Scientists | 19 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 347 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 13% |
Researcher | 47 | 13% |
Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 10% |
Other | 35 | 10% |
Other | 89 | 25% |
Unknown | 62 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 44% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 4% |
Other | 37 | 10% |
Unknown | 71 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 247. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#153,655
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#271
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#944
of 208,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.