↓ Skip to main content

Assessing recent warming using instrumentally homogeneous sea surface temperature records

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
142 news outlets
blogs
25 blogs
twitter
500 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
12 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing recent warming using instrumentally homogeneous sea surface temperature records
Published in
Science Advances, January 2017
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1601207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zeke Hausfather, Kevin Cowtan, David C. Clarke, Peter Jacobs, Mark Richardson, Robert Rohde

Abstract

Sea surface temperature (SST) records are subject to potential biases due to changing instrumentation and measurement practices. Significant differences exist between commonly used composite SST reconstructions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Extended Reconstruction Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST), the Hadley Centre SST data set (HadSST3), and the Japanese Meteorological Agency's Centennial Observation-Based Estimates of SSTs (COBE-SST) from 2003 to the present. The update from ERSST version 3b to version 4 resulted in an increase in the operational SST trend estimate during the last 19 years from 0.07° to 0.12°C per decade, indicating a higher rate of warming in recent years. We show that ERSST version 4 trends generally agree with largely independent, near-global, and instrumentally homogeneous SST measurements from floating buoys, Argo floats, and radiometer-based satellite measurements that have been developed and deployed during the past two decades. We find a large cooling bias in ERSST version 3b and smaller but significant cooling biases in HadSST3 and COBE-SST from 2003 to the present, with respect to most series examined. These results suggest that reported rates of SST warming in recent years have been underestimated in these three data sets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 500 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 246 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Student > Master 31 12%
Other 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 72 28%
Environmental Science 48 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 14%
Engineering 12 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 44 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1700. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,364
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#90
of 12,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88
of 424,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#1
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.