↓ Skip to main content

Examination of sex and minocycline treatment on acute morphine-induced analgesia and inflammatory gene expression along the pain pathway in Sprague–Dawley rats

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Sex Differences, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examination of sex and minocycline treatment on acute morphine-induced analgesia and inflammatory gene expression along the pain pathway in Sprague–Dawley rats
Published in
Biology of Sex Differences, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13293-015-0049-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin K. Posillico, Laurne S. Terasaki, Staci D. Bilbo, Jaclyn M. Schwarz

Abstract

In addition to its classical effects on opioid receptors, morphine can activate glia and stimulate the production of pro-inflammatory immune molecules which in turn counteract the analgesic properties of morphine. We hypothesized that decreased morphine analgesia in females may be the result of exaggerated microglial activation in brain regions critical for analgesia. Male and female rats were treated with morphine and/or minocycline and morphine analgesia was examined using the hot plate. We also examined the expression of microglial and astrocyte markers in the pain pathway. Males treated with minocycline, a microglial inhibitor, exhibited a significant increase in acute morphine analgesia as previously shown; however, morphine analgesia was not affected by minocycline pretreatment in female rats. Minocycline decreased the expression of glial activation markers in the male spinal cord and periaqueductal gray as expected; however, these same molecules were upregulated in the female. These data describe a significant difference between males and females in the behavioral effects following co-administration of morphine and minocycline.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 38%