You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility and acceptance of artificial intelligence-based diabetic retinopathy screening in Rwanda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjo-2022-322683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noelle Whitestone, John Nkurikiye, Jennifer L Patnaik, Nicolas Jaccard, Gabriella Lanouette, David H Cherwek, Nathan Congdon, Wanjiku Mathenge |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 270. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2023.
All research outputs
#125,117
of 24,406,678 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#31
of 5,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,922
of 288,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,678 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.