↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005231.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stead LF, Lancaster T

Abstract

It may be reasonable to try to reduce the harm from continued smoking amongst smokers unable or unwilling to quit. Possible approaches to reduce the exposure to toxins from smoking include reducing the amount of tobacco used, and using less toxic products. The interventions evaluated in controlled trials have predominantly attempted to reduce the number of cigarettes smoked.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 76 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 50%
Student > Master 38 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 33%
Student > Bachelor 25 28%
Unspecified 19 22%
Other 69 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 110%
Psychology 27 31%
Unspecified 24 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 24%
Social Sciences 17 19%
Other 38 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,094,779
of 8,163,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,229
of 8,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,239
of 123,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,163,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.