The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Xiongshao for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009581.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guo Hua Zheng, Jian Ping Liu, Jian Feng Chu, Lijuan Mei, Hai Ying Chen |
Abstract |
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement is a standard treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD). In-stent restenosis after PCI remains an important clinical problem. Xiongshao capsule has been reported to be beneficial in preventing restenosis after PCI in CHD patients. However, the strength of evidence to support its use is unclear. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 19% |
Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,471,554
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,534
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,737
of 209,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#246
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.