↓ Skip to main content

Woody Vegetation Die off and Regeneration in Response to Rainfall Variability in the West African Sahel

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Woody Vegetation Die off and Regeneration in Response to Rainfall Variability in the West African Sahel
Published in
Remote Sensing, January 2017
DOI 10.3390/rs9010039
Authors

Martin Brandt, Gray Tappan, Abdoul Diouf, Gora Beye, Cheikh Mbow, Rasmus Fensholt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,205,750
of 9,727,924 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#728
of 2,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,444
of 313,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#51
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,727,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.