You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure and self-titration of medication in primary care: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study of health professionals’ experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp13x668168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miren I Jones, Sheila M Greenfield, Emma P Bray, Fd Richard Hobbs, Roger Holder, Paul Little, Jonathan Mant, Bryan Williams, Richard J McManus |
| Abstract |
Self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensives leads to reduced blood pressure. Patients are keen on self-monitoring but little is known about healthcare professional views. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,926,349
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,274
of 4,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,018
of 194,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#23
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.