↓ Skip to main content

Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure and self-titration of medication in primary care: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study of health professionals’ experiences

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure and self-titration of medication in primary care: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study of health professionals’ experiences
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp13x668168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miren I Jones, Sheila M Greenfield, Emma P Bray, FD Richard Hobbs, Roger Holder, Paul Little, Jonathan Mant, Bryan Williams, Richard J McManus

Abstract

Self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensives leads to reduced blood pressure. Patients are keen on self-monitoring but little is known about healthcare professional views.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 12 23%
Researcher 9 17%
Unspecified 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Unspecified 16 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#9,781,135
of 12,241,269 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,101
of 2,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,355
of 143,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,241,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.