↓ Skip to main content

A pile of pipelines: An overview of the bioinformatics software for metabarcoding data analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology Resources, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,968)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
140 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pile of pipelines: An overview of the bioinformatics software for metabarcoding data analyses
Published in
Molecular Ecology Resources, August 2023
DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.13847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Hakimzadeh, Alejandro Abdala Asbun, Davide Albanese, Maria Bernard, Dominik Buchner, Benjamin Callahan, J. Gregory Caporaso, Emily Curd, Christophe Djemiel, Mikael Brandström Durling, Vasco Elbrecht, Zachary Gold, Hyun S. Gweon, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Falk Hildebrand, Vladimir Mikryukov, Eric Normandeau, Ezgi Özkurt, Jonathan M. Palmer, Géraldine Pascal, Teresita M. Porter, Daniel Straub, Martti Vasar, Tomáš Větrovský, Haris Zafeiropoulos, Sten Anslan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 48 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 26%
Environmental Science 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 53 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#556,026
of 26,243,295 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology Resources
#27
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,592
of 369,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology Resources
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.