↓ Skip to main content

Best Practices for Virtual Participation in Meetings: Experiences from Synthesis Centers

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 321)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
113 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best Practices for Virtual Participation in Meetings: Experiences from Synthesis Centers
Published in
Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/bes2.1290
Authors

Stephanie E. Hampton, Benjamin S. Halpern, Marten Winter, Jennifer K. Balch, John N. Parker, Jill S. Baron, Margaret Palmer, Mark P. Schildhauer, Pamela Bishop, Thomas R. Meagher, Alison Specht

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#366,373
of 17,415,680 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
#4
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,369
of 394,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,415,680 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.