↓ Skip to main content

Breathing exercises for dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breathing exercises for dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009041.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandy Jones, Alex Harvey, Louise Marston, Neil E O'Connell

Abstract

Dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome (DB/HVS) is a respiratory disorder, psychologically or physiologically based, involving breathing too deeply and/or too rapidly (hyperventilation) or erratic breathing interspersed with breath-holding or sighing (DB). DB/HVS can result in significant patient morbidity and an array of symptoms including breathlessness, chest tightness, dizziness, tremor and paraesthesia. DB/HVS has an estimated prevalence of 9.5% in the general adult population, however, there is little consensus regarding the most effective management of this patient group.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 29%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Other 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,229,402
of 14,559,106 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,506
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,288
of 153,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,559,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.