↓ Skip to main content

Systems virology: host-directed approaches to viral pathogenesis and drug targeting

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems virology: host-directed approaches to viral pathogenesis and drug targeting
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrmicro3036
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Lynn Law, Marcus J. Korth, Arndt G. Benecke, Michael G. Katze

Abstract

High-throughput molecular profiling and computational biology are changing the face of virology, providing a new appreciation of the importance of the host in viral pathogenesis and offering unprecedented opportunities for better diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Here, we provide a snapshot of the evolution of systems virology, from global gene expression profiling and signatures of disease outcome, to geometry-based computational methods that promise to yield novel therapeutic targets, personalized medicine and a deeper understanding of how viruses cause disease. To realize these goals, pipettes and Petri dishes need to join forces with the powers of mathematics and computational biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 2%
Chile 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 166 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 25 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,407,371
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1,479
of 2,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,923
of 195,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#18
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.