↓ Skip to main content

Pandemic gardening: A narrative review, vignettes and implications for future research

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pandemic gardening: A narrative review, vignettes and implications for future research
Published in
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, September 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128062
Authors

Jonathan Kingsley, Kelly Donati, Jill Litt, Naomi Shimpo, Chris Blythe, Jan Vávra, Silvio Caputo, Paul Milbourne, Lucy O. Diekmann, Nick Rose, Runrid Fox-Kämper, Agnes van den Berg, Geneviève S. Metson, Alessandro Ossola, Xiaoqi Feng, Thomas Astell-Burt, Amy Baker, Brenda B. Lin, Monika Egerer, Pauline Marsh, Philip Pettitt, Theresa L. Scott, Katherine Alaimo, Kate Neale, Troy Glover, Jason Byrne

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 2%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Researcher 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 40 82%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 40 82%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,121,076
of 26,510,312 outputs
Outputs from Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
#108
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,147
of 365,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,510,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.