| Title |
Conservation tools: the next generation of engineering–biology collaborations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsif.2023.0232 |
| Authors |
Andrew K. Schulz, Cassie Shriver, Suzanne Stathatos, Benjamin Seleb, Emily G. Weigel, Young-Hui Chang, M. Saad Bhamla, David L. Hu, Joseph R. Mendelson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 60% |
| Scientists | 15 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#860,199
of 24,935,186 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#423
of 3,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,926
of 316,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,935,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.