↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme for improving the health status of people with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care…

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme for improving the health status of people with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: the PRINCE cluster randomised trial
Published in
Thorax, June 2013
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dympna Casey, Kathy Murphy, Declan Devane, Adeline Cooney, Bernard McCarthy, Lorraine Mee, John Newell, Eamon O'Shea, Carl Scarrott, Paddy Gillespie, Collette Kirwan, Andrew W Murphy

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme on the health status of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
France 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 26%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 33 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Unspecified 12 12%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 11 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#565,671
of 13,022,627 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#248
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,413
of 149,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,022,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.