You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme for improving the health status of people with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: the PRINCE cluster randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thorax, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dympna Casey, Kathy Murphy, Declan Devane, Adeline Cooney, Bernard McCarthy, Lorraine Mee, John Newell, Eamon O'Shea, Carl Scarrott, Paddy Gillespie, Collette Kirwan, Andrew W Murphy, Maura Dowling, Mitra Shahidi, David Shaw, Thomas Kropman, Anthony O'Regan, Agnes Tully, Yvonne Conway, Michelle Glacken, Catherine Meagher |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme on the health status of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,301,527
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#524
of 5,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,103
of 198,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.