↓ Skip to main content

Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV-negative persons

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV-negative persons
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009190.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle HMMT van-Velthoven, Lorainne Tudor Car, Sarah Gentry, Josip Car

Abstract

This is one of the three Cochrane reviews that examine the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Although HIV infection can be prevented, still a large number of new infections occur. More effective HIV prevention interventions are needed to reduce the number of people newly infected with HIV. Phone calls can be used to potentially more effectively deliver HIV prevention interventions. They have the potential to save time, reduce costs and facilitate easier access.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 389 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 19%
Researcher 70 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Student > Postgraduate 29 7%
Other 75 19%
Unknown 59 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 33%
Social Sciences 50 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 12%
Psychology 42 10%
Computer Science 14 3%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 70 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#10,024,012
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,520
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,621
of 147,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.