↓ Skip to main content

Low glycaemic index diets for coronary heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low glycaemic index diets for coronary heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004467.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly S, Frost G, Whittaker V, Summerbell C

Abstract

The glycaemic index (GI) is a physiological measure of the ability of a carbohydrate to affect blood glucose. Interest is growing in the low GI carbohydrate concept for the clinical management of people at risk of, or with established coronary heart disease. There is a need to review the current evidence from controlled trials in this area.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Unspecified 8 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 34 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,014,523
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,464
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,975
of 138,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.