You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Investigating the Lymphatic Drainage of the Brain: Essential Skills and Tools
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 24 |
Book title |
Inflammation
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6786-5_24 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6784-1, 978-1-4939-6786-5
|
Authors |
Nazira J. Albargothy, Matthew MacGregor Sharp, Maureen Gatherer, Alan Morris, Roy O. Weller, Cheryl Hawkes, Roxana O. Carare M.D., Ph.D., Roxana O. Carare |
Editors |
Björn E. Clausen, Jon D. Laman |
Abstract |
In this chapter we describe in detail the surgical and imaging techniques employed for the study of the anatomical routes of drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) from the brain. The types of tracers, sites of injection, and volumes injected are crucial. For example, when testing the drainage of ISF from the parenchyma, volumes larger than 0.5 μL result in spillage of ISF into the ventricular CSF. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 50% |
Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Professor | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,819,626
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,878
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,331
of 420,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#339
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.