↓ Skip to main content

Plastic materials recycling: the importance of the correct identification

Overview of attention for article published in Polímeros, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 103)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plastic materials recycling: the importance of the correct identification
Published in
Polímeros, July 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0104-14282008000200008
Authors

Leda Coltro, Bruno F. Gasparino, Guilherme de C. Queiroz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 25%
Student > Master 23 24%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 31%
Chemistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Polímeros
#19
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,600
of 97,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polímeros
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them