You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Usefulness of measurement of heart rate variability by holter ECG in hemodialysis patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nephrology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12882-016-0423-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nanami Kida, Yoshiharu Tsubakihara, Hirota Kida, Shunro Ageta, Makoto Arai, Yoshinosuke Hamada, Nariaki Matsuura |
| Abstract |
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) is one of most common complications of hemodialysis patients. Heart rate variability (HRV) is the predictor of death in heart disease patients. However, there are no studies on the role of HRV in hemodialysis patients. From September 2009 to March 2011, 24-h electrocardiography was performed in 101 hemodialysis patients. Standard deviation of sequential 5-minute N-N interval means (SDANN) and standard deviation of the N-N interval (SDNN) was examined by a 24-h ECG analysis. Patients were observed prospectively. The primary endpoints were incidence of MACCE and MACCE-free survival. We studied 90 hemodialysis patients (64 males, 63.4 ± 11.8 years old). During a follow-up period of 32.0 ± 11.7 months, 33 patients developed MACCE. 24-h ECG showed mean SDNN 93.4 ± 33.4 ms and mean SDANN 83.2 ± 31.3 ms. MACCE group showed significantly lower SDNN and SDANN than event-free group. In Kaplan-Meier analysis higher SDNN and SDANN group showed significantly higher event-free survival rate than lower group. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, SDNN was independent prognostic factor while SDANN or diabetic status was not significant. In diabetic cases, there were no differences in any factors for the incidence of MACCE between higher SDNN, SDANN groups and lower groups. On the other hand in non-diabetic cases, lower SDNN or SDANN group developed significantly higher MACCE than higher groups. Measurement of HRV by Holter ECG is useful to predict MACCE in hemodialysis patients, especially non-diabetic group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,510,888
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,889
of 2,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,851
of 420,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#40
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,488 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.