Title |
Enhanced mitochondrial genome analysis: bioinformatic and long-read sequencing advances and their diagnostic implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/14737159.2023.2241365 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William L. Macken, Micol Falabella, Chiara Pizzamiglio, Cathy E. Woodward, Elizabeth Scotchman, Lyn S. Chitty, James M. Polke, Enrico Bugiardini, Michael G. Hanna, Jana Vandrovcova, Natalie Chandler, Robyn Labrum, Robert D.S. Pitceathly |
Abstract |
Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMDs) comprise a large and heterogeneous group of genetic diseases that result from pathogenic variants in either nuclear DNA (nDNA) or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has improved the efficiency and accuracy of mtDNA diagnoses; however, several challenges remain. In this review, we briefly summarize the current state of the art in molecular diagnostics for mtDNA and consider the implications of improved whole genome sequencing (WGS), bioinformatic techniques, and the adoption of long-read sequencing, for PMD diagnostics. We anticipate that the application of PCR-free WGS from blood DNA will increase in diagnostic laboratories, while for adults with myopathic presentations, WGS from muscle DNA may become more widespread. Improved bioinformatic strategies will enhance WGS data interrogation, with more accurate delineation of mtDNA and NUMTs (nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments) in WGS data, superior coverage uniformity, indirect measurement of mtDNA copy number, and more accurate interpretation of heteroplasmic large-scale rearrangements (LSRs). Separately, the adoption of diagnostic long-read sequencing could offer greater resolution of complex LSRs and the opportunity to phase heteroplasmic variants. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 20 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
Scientists | 6 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |