↓ Skip to main content

Topical herbal therapies for treating osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topical herbal therapies for treating osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melainie Cameron, Sigrun Chrubasik

Abstract

Before extraction and synthetic chemistry were invented, musculoskeletal complaints were treated with preparations from medicinal plants. They were either administered orally or topically. In contrast to the oral medicinal plant products, topicals act in part as counterirritants or are toxic when given orally.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 318 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 19%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 24 7%
Other 76 24%
Unknown 63 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Psychology 15 5%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 74 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#259,040
of 19,181,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#509
of 11,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,035
of 169,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,181,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.