↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life in community-dwelling Dutch elderly measured by EQ-5D-3L

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of life in community-dwelling Dutch elderly measured by EQ-5D-3L
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12955-016-0577-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Josée J. Mangen, Marieke Bolkenbaas, Susanne M. Huijts, Cornelis H. van Werkhoven, Marc J. M. Bonten, G. Ardine de Wit

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate health status and associated factors in community-dwelling elderly in the Netherlands. Participants from a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands were invited at the time of enrolment to participate in this study. Data were collected on comorbidities, socio-demographic background and health status, using EQ-5D-3L instrument. EQ-5D-3L summary index values (EQ-5D-indices) was derived using Dutch tariff. Regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with EQ-5D-indices and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). 48,634 elderly (≥65 years) were included. The most frequently reported complaint was pain/discomfort (29.4%), but for the elder elderly (i.e. ≥85 years) it was mobility (52.9%). The proportion of persons reporting (multiple) problems increased with age from 31.5% for 65-69 years old subjects to 65.9% for elder elderly. The mean EQ-5D-indices and EQ-VAS decreased with age from 0.94 and 84, respectively in those 65 to 69 years old to 0.86 and 76, respectively, in ≥85 years old subjects. Increasing age, female gender, low education, geographic factors and comorbidities were associated with impaired health status. Within community-dwelling elderly large differences in health status exist. Impairment increases rapidly with age, but health status is also associated with socio-demographic variables and comorbidities. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00812084 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 25 19%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Researcher 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 56 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,855,900
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,499
of 2,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,424
of 420,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#28
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.