The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors Associated With Initiation of Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Sepsis: Retrospective Observational Study.
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Critical Care, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.4037/ajcc2023299 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert E Freundlich, Gen Li, Aleda Leis, Milo Engoren |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#343,805
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Critical Care
#10
of 899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,180
of 339,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Critical Care
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them