You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zinc levels in seminal plasma and their correlation with male infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep22386 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiang Zhao, Xingyou Dong, Xiaoyan Hu, Zhou Long, Liang Wang, Qian Liu, Bishao Sun, Qingqing Wang, Qingjian Wu, Longkun Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#429,746
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,735
of 143,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,446
of 313,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#137
of 3,462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.